医師の一分

アクセスカウンタ

zoom RSS 急拡大するインドの代理出産ビジネス

<<   作成日時 : 2008/03/11 00:08   >>

ブログ気持玉 0 / トラックバック 0 / コメント 0

画像 生殖アウトソーシングとして知られる事業はインドで急速に拡大するビジネスである。外国人に代理母を提供するクリニックは、米欧諸国からの要望で、熟練した医療専門家と相対的に寛大な法律と低価格が合いまって、繁盛している。いくつかの州や欧州諸国で禁止されている代理母は2002年にインドで公認された。費用は約25,000ドルで米国の1/3であり、医学的処置や代理母への支払いやインドへの2回の旅費とホテル代を含んでいる。正確な統計はないが件数は急増している。カリフォルニアの医療旅行社PlanetHospitalは、2007年に取扱開始し25件だったが、今年は少なくとも100件を予定している。問い合わせは数百件あるという。グジャラート州西部の都市アナンドでは、50人以上の代理母が妊娠中で、15人はクリニック付属のユースホステルに住んでいる。アナンドクリニックには、米国で自ら代理母を雇用する余裕がある夫婦でも、飲酒・喫煙・薬物のない女性を求めて1日10件のメール問い合わせがあるという。インド医学研究協議会のガイドラインの下で代理母は権利放棄の署名をし、出生証明書にも名前は載らない。こうしたことが子供を国外に出すプロセスを簡単にしている。しかし多くの利用者にとって圧倒的な魅力はその価格にある。金持ちの外国人が子宮を容易に「借りる」ことを可能にしている。インド政府は医療旅行メディカルツーリズムmedical tourismの目的地として活発に促進しているが、赤ん坊をお金に換えることは多くの人にとっていい気分にはならない。女性子ども省は代理母を制限するよう法制化を考慮すると2月に言ったが進んでいない。惨めな貧乏国で、1日2回の十分な食事をとる事ができるという事のみで代理母に同意しないようにといった保証ができるかどうか怪しい。
----------------
子宮のアウトソーシング Outsourced Wombs
http://kurie.at.webry.info/200801/article_12.html
----------------
代理出産、法律で原則禁止に 学術会議が最終報告
http://www.asahi.com/life/update/0307/TKY200803070291.html
2008年03月08日00時36分
 日本学術会議の「生殖補助医療の在り方検討委員会」(鴨下重彦委員長)は7日、代理出産の原則禁止を盛り込んだ「生殖補助医療法」(仮称)を定めるように求めた最終報告書をまとめた。法律で、営利目的の代理出産をあっせんした業者、実施した医師、依頼者を処罰対象とすることで規制に実効性を持たせようとしている。一方で、公的機関の厳格な管理のもと、試行(臨床試験)の道も残した。
 幹事会の承認を経て、4月に審議依頼された厚生労働省、法務省に提出する。議論は今後、国会に移るが、法案づくりを政府が主導するのか、議員立法になるのか、は不透明だ。また、議員には代理出産容認論もあり、意見集約の難しさを指摘する声も出ている。ねじれ国会の影響から、議論がいつ始まるかも分からない。
 報告書では、子宮がない女性にとって、代理出産以外に血のつながった子を産む方法がないことから、公的機関の管理と法律の規定する要件のなかで、試行として実施されることは考慮していい、とした。
 試行的な代理出産で子どもが生まれた場合、産んだ女性を母親と規定。外国で生まれたケースも含め、依頼者との親子関係は、養子や特別養子の縁組で認めるとした。
 代理出産で生まれた子が、自分が誰から生まれたかを知ることを、権利としてどこまで認めるかや、第三者から提供された卵子と夫の精子を体外受精させて妊娠、出産する方法の是非については「今後の重要な検討課題」などとして、結論は出さなかった。
----------------
PLANETHOSPITAL
http://planethospital.com
Surrogate
*Gestational surrogacy with donor egg
*Gestational surrogacy with donor sperm
*Surrogacy for single men or women (pending criminal background check in your own country)
*Surrogcy for gay couples
Pricing Summary
Surrogacy can be done in INDIA. $25000 to $35000.
----------------------------------------
India Nurtures Business of Surrogate Motherhood
By AMELIA GENTLEMAN
Published: March 10, 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/10/world/asia/10surrogate.html?_r=1&ref=health&oref=slogin

Stephanie Sinclair/VII Network
Rubin Mondal, a counselor and former surrogate mother in Anand, India, sat last spring with Razia Vohra, a surrogate.

MUMBAI ― Yonatan Gher and his partner, who are Israeli, plan eventually to tell their child about being made in India, in the womb of a stranger, with the egg of a Mumbai housewife they picked from an Internet lineup.

Women like these at a clinic in Anand can earn much more as surrogate mothers than at normal jobs.

The embryo was formed in January in an Indian fertility clinic about 2,500 miles from the couple’s home in Tel Aviv, produced by doctors who have begun specializing in surrogacy services for couples from around the world.

“The child will know early on that he or she is unique, that it came into the world in a very special way,” said Mr. Gher, 29, a communications officer for the environmental group Greenpeace.

An enterprise known as reproductive outsourcing is a new but rapidly expanding business in India. Clinics that provide surrogate mothers for foreigners say they have recently been inundated with requests from the United States and Europe, as word spreads of India’s mix of skilled medical professionals, relatively liberal laws and low prices.

Commercial surrogacy, which is banned in some states and some European countries, was legalized in India in 2002. The cost comes to about $25,000, roughly a third of the typical price in the United States. That includes the medical procedures; payment to the surrogate mother, which is often, but not always, done through the clinic; plus air tickets and hotels for two trips to India (one for the fertilization and a second to collect the baby).

“People are increasingly exposed to the idea of surrogacy in India; Oprah Winfrey talked about it on her show,” said Dr. Kaushal Kadam at the Rotunda clinic in Mumbai. Just an hour earlier she had created an embryo for Mr. Gher and his partner with sperm from one of them (they would not say which) and an egg removed from a donor just minutes before in another part of the clinic.

The clinic, known more formally as Rotunda ― The Center for Human Reproduction, does not permit contact between egg donor, surrogate mother or future parents. The donor and surrogate are always different women; doctors say surrogates are less likely to bond with the babies if there is no genetic connection.

There are no firm statistics on how many surrogacies are being arranged in India for foreigners, but anecdotal evidence suggests a sharp increase.

Rudy Rupak, co-founder and president of PlanetHospital, a medical tourism agency with headquarters in California, said he expected to send at least 100 couples to India this year for surrogacy, up from 25 in 2007, the first year he offered the service.

“Every time there is a success story, hundreds of inquiries follow,” he said.

In Anand, a city in the eastern state of Gujarat where the practice was pioneered in India, more than 50 surrogate mothers are pregnant with the children of couples from the United States, Britain and elsewhere. Fifteen of them live together in a hostel attached to the clinic there.

Dr. Naina Patel, who runs the Anand clinic, said that even Americans who could afford to hire surrogates at home were coming to her for women “free of vices like alcohol, smoking and drugs.” She said she gets about 10 e-mailed inquiries a day from couples abroad.

Under guidelines issued by the Indian Council of Medical Research, surrogate mothers sign away their rights to any children. A surrogate’s name is not even on the birth certificate.

This eases the process of taking the baby out of the country. But for many, like Lisa Switzer, 40, a medical technician from San Antonio whose twins are being carried by a surrogate mother from the Rotunda clinic, the overwhelming attraction is the price. “Doctors, lawyers, accountants, they can afford it, but the rest of us ― the teachers, the nurses, the secretaries ― we can’t,” she said. “Unless we go to India.”

Surrogacy is an area fraught with ethical and legal uncertainties. Critics argue that the ease with which relatively rich foreigners are able to “rent” the wombs of poor Indians creates the potential for exploitation. Although the government is actively promoting India as a medical tourism destination, what some see as an exchange of money for babies has made many here uncomfortable.

The Ministry of Women and Child Development said in February that it was weighing recommending legislation to govern surrogacy, but it is not imminent.

An article published in The Times of India in February questioned how such a law would be enforced: “In a country crippled by abject poverty,” it asked, “how will the government body guarantee that women will not agree to surrogacy just to be able to eat two square meals a day?”

Even some of those involved in the business of organizing surrogates want greater regulation.

“There must be protection for the surrogates,” Mr. Rupak said. “Inevitably, people are going to smell the money, and unscrupulous operators will get into the game. I don’t trust the industry to police itself.”
Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image
J. Adam Huggins for The International Herald Tribune

Yonatan Gher, an Israeli, made his first trip to Mumbai with his partner in January to visit a fertility clinic.

He said that the few doctors offering the service now were ethical and took good care of the surrogates but that he was concerned this might change as the business expanded.

Mr. Gher and his partner, who asked not to be named to preserve his privacy, have worked through their doubts and are certain they are doing a good thing.

“People can believe me when I say that if I could bear the baby myself I would,” he said. “But this is a mutually beneficial answer. The surrogate gets a fair amount of money for being part of the process.”

They are paying about $30,000, of which the surrogate gets about $7,500.

“Surrogates do it to give their children a better education, to buy a home, to start up a small business, a shop,” Dr. Kadam said. “This is as much money as they could earn in maybe three years. I really don’t think that this is exploiting the women. I feel it is two people who are helping out each other.”

Mr. Gher agreed. “You cannot ignore the discrepancies between Indian poverty and Western wealth,” he said. “We try our best not to abuse this power. Part of our choice to come here was the idea that there was an opportunity to help someone in India.”

In the Mumbai clinic, it is clear that an exchange between rich and poor is under way. On some contracts, the thumbprint of an illiterate surrogate stands out against the clients’ signatures.

Although some Indian clinics allow surrogates and clients to meet, Mr. Gher said he preferred anonymity. When his surrogate gives birth later this year, he and his partner will be in the hospital, but not in the ward where she is in labor, and will be handed the baby by a nurse.

The surrogate mother does not know that she is working for foreigners, Dr. Kadam said, and has not been told that the future parents are both men. Gay sex is illegal in India.

Israel legalized adoption by same-sex couples in February, but such couples are not permitted to hire surrogates in Israel to become parents. A fertility doctor recommended Rotunda, which made news in November when its doctors delivered twins for another gay Israeli couple.

Rotunda did not allow interviews with its surrogate mothers, but a 32-year-old woman at a fertility clinic in Delhi explained why she is planning on her second surrogacy in two years.

Separated from her husband, she found that her monthly wages of 2,800 rupees, about $69, as a midwife were not enough to raise her 9-year-old son. With the money she earned from the first surrogacy, more than $13,600, she bought a house. She expects to pay for her son’s education with what she earns for the second, about $8,600. (Fees are typically fixed by the doctor and can vary.) “I will save the money for my child’s future,” she said.

The process requires a degree of subterfuge in this socially conservative country. She has told her mother, who lives with her, but not her son or their neighbors. She has told the few who have asked her outright that she is bearing a child for a relative.

So far, for the Israeli couple, the experience of having a baby has been strangely virtual. They perused profiles of egg donors that were sent by e-mail (“We picked the one with the highest level of education,” Mr. Gher said). From information that followed, they rejected a factory worker in favor of a housewife, who they thought would have a less stressful lifestyle.

Mr. Gher posts updates about the process on Facebook. And soon the clinic will start sending ultrasound images of their developing child by e-mail. Highly pixelated, blown-up passport photos of the egg donor and surrogate mother adorn a wall of their apartment in Israel.

“We’ve been trying to half close our eyes and look at it in a more holistic way to imagine what she would actually look like,” Mr. Gher said of the donor’s blurred image. “These are women we don’t know, will never know, who will become in a way part of our lives.”

テーマ

関連テーマ 一覧


月別リンク

ブログ気持玉

クリックして気持ちを伝えよう!
ログインしてクリックすれば、自分のブログへのリンクが付きます。
→ログインへ

トラックバック(0件)

タイトル (本文) ブログ名/日時

トラックバック用URL help


自分のブログにトラックバック記事作成(会員用) help

タイトル
本 文

コメント(0件)

内 容 ニックネーム/日時

コメントする help

ニックネーム
本 文
急拡大するインドの代理出産ビジネス 医師の一分/BIGLOBEウェブリブログ
文字サイズ:       閉じる