医師の一分

アクセスカウンタ

zoom RSS ワシントン州のER受診制限を提訴/米国救急医学会 

<<   作成日時 : 2011/10/05 21:12   >>

なるほど(納得、参考になった、ヘー) ブログ気持玉 1 / トラックバック 0 / コメント 0

 米国救急医学会は、低収入のメディケイド患者の緊急でないER受診を年に3回までと制限する決定を覆すためにワシントン州を訴えた。患者を危険に曝すものだとしている。ER治療費を下げるために制限を設けた。700の非急性症状のリストには、呼吸困難やめまい、妊娠初期出血、結石、腹痛、心臓発作と関連しない胸痛が含まれている。
 この制限により州と連邦政府の予算を7200万ドル削減することを目論んでいるが、医師らは、このリストは「とても恐ろしい危険な提案」だとしている。

-----------------------------------------------------
Doctors Sue Over ER Limits in Washington State
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/doctors-sue-er-limits-washington-state/story?id=14647658

By OLIVIA KATRANDJIAN
Oct. 1, 2011

画像The American College of Emergency Physicians is suing the state of Washington in an effort to overturn the decision that low-income Medicaid patients will be limited to three non-emergency visits to the emergency room each year, which goes into effect today.

The suit seeks to get rid of the limit, which it says puts patients at risk.

The limit, which was created to reduce costs in emergency rooms, comes with a new list of 700 non-emergency symptoms, including difficulty breathing, dizziness, early-pregnancy hemorrhage, gall stones, abdominal pains and chest pains not related to a heart attack.

Patients with any of the 700 symptoms are urged to visit the regular doctor's office instead of the emergency room.

But doctors say patients may not be able to tell if their symptoms are indicative of an emergency.

For example, if a child burns himself on the stove, a parent may not know the difference between first, second and third degree burns.

"The ACEP is opposing the limit primarily because of the list of diagnoses that the state is proposing to be non-emergencies, like chest pains and heart arrhythmias and dysrhythmias, which can result in sudden death, sudden blindness, and hemorrhages during miscarriage," ACEP Washington Chapter president Steve Anderson said. "Their proposal is dangerous. It's almost funny it's so scary they would have them on the list.

"I don't want people to sit at home and self diagnose. People should seek care early for true emergencies -- that's what the ER is for. We're open 24/7, 365 days a year, so if your chest pains started at 10 p.m., you shouldn't wait until the next morning to call your primary care doctor," he said.

Sexually transmitted diseases are also included on the list of non-emergencies.

"A lot of people don't want to go to their family doctor with these issues," Anderson said.

The limit, which will cut $72 million in state and federal funds, is included in the 2011-13 Washington State budget.

"We want to save the state money. We want to work with the state," Anderson said. "But they were given a number to reach for the budget, and the only way to do so was to add diagnoses to the list that they originally decided were unquestionably emergencies. That's where we have to draw the line."

The Washington State Hospital Association (WSHA), the Washington State Medical Association (WSMA), and the Washington Chapter of the Academy of Emergency Physicians (WCAEP) have also released statements saying they object to the change.

"We share the state's goal of reducing preventable emergency room visits. However, this benefit limit is not a reasonable approach to the problem," read a statement on the WSHA website.

"[The list] contains many emergency conditions such as chest pain, women having miscarriages, and children who are ill and in pain," the statement read. "In addition, the list creates a public health concern as patients who have sexually transmitted diseases are being asked to wait until they can get a primary care office visit."

If a Medicaid patient comes in for a fourth emergency room visit with non-emergency symptoms, he or she will be treated, but the state won't pay the hospital. Instead, the hospital will have to pay for it.

"There is a national legislation called the Prudent Lay Person Law, which says that your average Joe, if he has what he thinks is an emergency, is entitled to go to the ER, be evaluated and treated for it, and his insurance company can't retrospectively deny it," Anderson said. "That's in place to protect everybody. Not just Medicaid patients -- everybody. Our concern is that the health care authority said that doesn't apply to our clients. We're terrified that other places in the country will feel that it doesn't apply to their clients and constituents as well."
VIDEO: Washington State would limit ER visits to three per year for Medicaid patients.

The Healthcare Authority of Washington has been in contact with 15 other states regarding the emergency room limit. If the limit works in Washington, these other states are considering implementing it.

Calls made by ABC News to Washington State officials were not immediately returned, and there are no press releases or news statements pertaining to the issue on the state website.

テーマ

関連テーマ 一覧


月別リンク

ブログ気持玉

クリックして気持ちを伝えよう!
ログインしてクリックすれば、自分のブログへのリンクが付きます。
→ログインへ
気持玉数 : 1
なるほど(納得、参考になった、ヘー)

トラックバック(0件)

タイトル (本文) ブログ名/日時

トラックバック用URL help


自分のブログにトラックバック記事作成(会員用) help

タイトル
本 文

コメント(0件)

内 容 ニックネーム/日時

コメントする help

ニックネーム
本 文
ワシントン州のER受診制限を提訴/米国救急医学会  医師の一分/BIGLOBEウェブリブログ
文字サイズ:       閉じる